IEyeNews

iLocal News Archives

US: Media war in Cincinnati may make our Cayman TV station take notice

gannett-earnsThe Letter By Perry Simon From All Access Music Group

There’s a little media war going on in Cincinnati over which some folks in the newspaper industry are getting very upset. A little while back, a local TV station decided to put its website behind a paywall, and went out and hired an expanded staff to bulk up its content, and, recently, it decided to amp up its marketing with a campaign directly targeting the city’s daily newspaper, with the hashtag #DropThePaper as the centerpiece.

Needless to say, newspaper people are treating this as disrespectful, wrong, crude, and a sign of the apocalypse. HOW DARE THEY? is the general sentiment. Don’t they respect the pivotal role newspapers play in society? How can they be so cavalier?

My reaction is different, but first, let me ask you: Have you picked up a newspaper lately? Not the web version, but the paper kind? If you have, you may have noticed a few things: It’s gotten smaller, not only in dimensions but thickness. Some papers — the Gannett chain, which owns the Cincinnati paper, is doing this nationally — have substituted a generic USA Today section for some sections, leaving local content pretty thin. And what’s in the paper is generally what you read online the day before. In short, if newspapers are still claiming the high ground in newsgathering, the product they’re putting out is no longer living up to the reputation. It’s all online now.

Meanwhile, the suggestion that a TV station website can’t be a replacement for a newspaper is also an archaic idea. Why CAN’T a TV station website be a legitimate news source on par with, or better than, a website representing a newspaper? And, for that matter — here’s where radio comes in — why can’t ANYONE’S website be a competitor in the news field? If newspapers long ago began to dismantle their own brands, why can’t other media companies step into the breach and provide what people want and need from a news site?

The point is, looking at the WCPO-TV vs. Cincinnati Enquirer sniping as TV vs. newspapers is outmoded thinking. We’re a few decades into the commercial Internet, and a lot of people in our business just can’t see that the shackles are gone, the definitions of what your business is are no longer restrictive, and the opportunity to redefine what you do is unlimited. Here, though, I have to call out the radio companies that are telling Wall Street that they’re digital media companies now, because that would be good if they were doing something different with their digital assets. Why is it that radio station websites are a) cookie cutter and b) mostly populated with generic, common content? Why aren’t you generating something other than rehashed Us Weekly or BuzzFeed posts? Why does your radio brand need to mean your terrestrial signal and duplicative stream? Why are your digital assets being used mostly as passive promotion or superfluous additional content? If you really believe that you’re a digital content producer, why can’t you, too, compete with better news, better multimedia content, better everything?

Oh, right, money. But TV is in the same financial bind as radio is, and we see this paywall experiment. Anyone in radio rolling the dice that way? I’d like to know, and I’ll relay good ideas in this column, because if anyone’s trying to redefine this business, it’s worth highlighting, and we, as an industry, tend to respond to such initiatives with scorn and derision… until one works, in which case everyone copies it and claims to have invented it. If someone really is trying something radical — not just a new format or adding a live events division or slapping some podcasts on their websites, but something that breaks down self-imposed business barriers and has the potential to really change everything about their business — we shouldn’t reject it because “that’s not what we do.”

What the TV station is doing is pretty audacious. It may not work. Getting people to pay anything for a website is going to be very hard — even if, as they’re doing, you discount it to a cheap price and throw in extras like a digital subscription to — ha! — another newspaper in the bargain. I’m not sold that what they’re doing will be perceived as an adequate replacement for the local paper, or worth paying for when the three rival TV stations with online news are still free. But at least someone’s trying to throw out the definition of what a broadcast station can do, and it only takes one experiment that works to show the way for an entire industry. We need that kind of audacious thinking in the radio industry again, on a programming level, on a marketing level, on a business plan level. And if it puts us in the kind of media slapfight that’s happening in Cincinnati, well, if there’s anything we know, radio people are good at that kind of thing.

 

You can follow my personal Twitter account at @pmsimon, and my Instagram account (same handle, @pmsimon) as well? And you can find me on Facebook at www.facebook.com/pmsimon.

Full Disclosure: I also serve as Director of Programming for Nerdist Industries, a division of Legendary Pictures and Legendary Digital Networks, which includes the Nerdist Podcast Network, one of your major podcast entities.

 

You’d think that for the closing, I’d do what I always do and talk about a certain alma mater’s recent success in March Madness and making the Elite 8 and… no, can’t jinx it. The less I say and the more I fear the inevitable disappointment, the better they seem to play. So ixnay on the Illanovavay talk for now. There’ll be time for celebration or misery soon enough.

Perry Michael Simon Vice President/Editor, News-Talk-Sports AllAccess.com

[email protected] www.facebook.com/pmsimon Twitter @pmsimon Instagram @pmsimon

END

IMAGE: www.nydailynews.com

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *