Representation of the People
(Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories) Bill

 The Bill extends representation in the House of Commons to the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories, on the same basis as parts of the United Kingdom.
 Members of Parliament for the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories will be elected at the same time as those representing constituencies in the United Kingdom at a general election, or at a by-election should a vacancy occur.

The purpose of this Bill is to give to British citizens in the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories equal national parliamentary representation to those in the UK, a democratic right long
overdue. It is to modernise and democratise the UK’s relationship with them, similar to those of France, Denmark and the Netherlands with their Overseas Territories.

It does not affect the constitutional relationships which they have with the Crown and the UK, which are entirely separate and continue to be subject to evolvement and change over the years, nor the laws of any dependencies or territories as to how they conduct their own elections for their own legislatures, which will continue as they have done before.

There is also no change to how the governments of the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories represent their interests in the United Kingdom.

Each of the three Crown Dependencies will form a constituency in its own right, on account of their larger electorates, Jersey and the Isle of Man having an electorate comparable to that the average constituency in the UK. The constituency for Guernsey includes the dependencies of Alderney and Sark, which have their own legislatures, but form parts of the Bailiwick of Guernsey.

Three of the constituencies for the Overseas Territories will be composed of a single territory, while each of the remaining three will be composed of multiple territories, on account of their smaller electorates, even combined. These could be defined as ‘protected constituencies’, similar to the
Scottish constituencies of Orkney and Shetland and Na h-Eileanan an Iar.

Under the Bill, these MPs will have the same voting rights as existing MPs, but will have the right not to exercise them. One model for this could be the convention in the States of Guernsey, in which the two representatives of Alderney have equal status to deputies elected from Guernsey itself, but
generally only vote on ‘Bailiwick-wide’ as opposed to ‘Guernsey only’ legislation.

The main advantage for the people of the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories will be having their own dedicated constituency MPs. By contrast, they presently have no option but to approach existing MPs in the UK, who may decline to take matters up on their behalf. In fact, MPs
are only able to only to do so on behalf of their own constituents.

In addition, the presence of such MPs would create a greater understanding among existing MPs of the places they represent. As they would be interacting with them every day as colleagues, MPs
from the UK would gain knowledge of the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories first hand, instead of by indirect means, filtered through their government offices in London.

Although there are All-Party Parliamentary Groups for various some of the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, they clearly have no representation from them on these groups. In any event, these informal groups have little actual influence, as there is much more influence with Select Committees in the House of Commons, not least those on Defence and Foreign Affairs.

There is an argument for establishing a single Committee for the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, but that is a separate matter for Parliament to decide on.

In addition, we recommend that people from the territories and dependencies be appointed to the
House of Lords. This is not part of this Bill either, but there is nothing stopping this happening
within the very near future.

With regard to such committees, Denmark’s single-chamber Folketing, to which Greenland and the
Faroe Islands each elect two members, has a committee for each of those autonomous countries,
composed of around a sixth of the entire legislature. However, their representatives also serve on
defence, foreign affairs and legal affairs committees, on the same basis as Denmark proper.

In the Netherlands, one sixth of the Second Chamber or lower house of the States-General makes up
a ‘Commission on Kingdom Relations’ responsible for the Caribbean part of the Kingdom, with an
equal number as substitutes. This is is separate from the Commission on the Interior, despite both
being the responsibility of a single Ministry of Interior and Kingdom Relations in The Hague.

This could serve as a model for the UK, although ideally, a separate ‘Dependencies and Territories
Office’, similar to the Ministry of the Overseas in France should be created. At present,
responsibility for the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories is duplicated, divided between
the Ministry of Justice, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Ministry of Defence.

The creation of such bodies in the UK Parliament, drawing their membership from both House of
Commons and the House of Lords, should take account of the distinct circumstances of the Crown
Dependencies and Overseas Territories. In this respect, it would be similar to those created for
Northern Ireland, although their domestic constitutional arrangements would remain unchanged.

However, such matters are not part of this Bill, and can be decided upon by Parliament if it wishes,
once there are MPs from the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies. In due course, their
presence in both Houses of Parliament should come to be seen as an asset to its work on a whole
range of issues which affect the UK, the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies alike.

These include the UK’s role in the world, not least in relation to defence and foreign affairs, but also
affairs relating to the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies for which its Parliament
legislates. As with their French and Danish counterparts, what geographical areas they represent
will be seen as of secondary importance to the contributions they make.

Instead of relying on All-Party Parliamentary Groups consisting of existing MPs to raise issues on
their behalf, these MPs may do so directly. In fact, the British Virgin Islands and Turks and Caicos
do not even have their own groups, instead dependent on the one on all the Overseas Territories,
while Jersey and Guernsey are dependent on a single one on the Channel Islands.

Being representatives as opposed to delegates, MPs regularly take up issues of interest to
themselves, if not to their constituents, as reflected by their membership of various All-Party
Parliamentary Groups. Those representing the dependencies and territories will be no different in
that respect, given their historical and geographic links with different parts of the world.

However, they would be free to join, chair or found any All-Party Parliamentary Group on a subject
as well as one on a country, and speak on related issues in the House of Commons, even if they do
not vote on related legislation. This would serve to develop strong cross-party working relationships
with MPs in the UK, who would in turn, see them as colleagues with mutual interests.

The Gibraltar, Mediterranean and Indian Ocean constituency will comprise Gibraltar, the Sovereign
Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia, and the British Indian Ocean Territory, with the vast majority
being in Gibraltar. By contrast, when Gibraltar was combined with the South West England
electoral region in the European Parliament its 24 000 voters made up only a tiny minority.

Even if those Cypriots living and working in the Sovereign Base Areas did not exercise their right,
as qualifying Commonwealth citizens, to vote in these elections, the MP for Gibraltar,
Mediterranean and Indian Ocean would still have an incentive to join the All-Party Parliamentary
Groups on Cyprus and the Chagos Islands, in addition to those on other countries and subjects.

The constituency of the South Atlantic and Pacific, comprising the Falkland Islands, Saint Helena,
Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands, the British Antarctic
Territory and the Pitcairn Islands will have the smallest electorate, with a total of approximately
4500 voters, comparable to that of the French overseas collectivity of Saint Pierre et Miquelon.

However, despite its size, Saint Pierre et Miquelon has long formed a constituency in its own right,
electing its own deputy to the National Assembly in Paris. This was even the case when the far
larger Overseas Territories in Africa were represented, for example, the Ivory Coast in 1958 had a
single deputy for 1.6 million voters, the same as Saint Pierre et Miquelon for only 2800.

This remains the case today, despite the National Assembly, with 577 deputies, being smaller than
the House of Commons with 650 MPs. Saint Pierre et Miquelon, which still has fewer than 5000
voters, has equal representation with the sixth constituency of Seine-Maritime, which with nearly
110 000 voters, has the largest electorate of any constituency in metropolitan France.

With regard to the Leeward Islands constituency, the choice of name reflects the historic links
between the British Virgin Islands, Anguilla and Montserrat from when they formed parts of a
federal colony of that name. However, the separate constitutional status of each territory would be
unaffected by their combination into a single constituency in the House of Commons.

The neighbouring French island of Saint Barthélemy, with an electorate of 5500, jointly elects a deputy with the larger collectivity of Saint Martin, a legacy of when they were both part of the overseas department of Guadeloupe. Despite this, the two collectivities are separately represented in the Senate, with each having its own senator, indirectly elected by its territorial council.

The qualifications for election as a Member of Parliament for a Crown Dependency or Overseas
Territory will be the same as those for election as a Member of Parliament for a constituency in the
United Kingdom, irrespective of what qualifications may be required for election as a member of a
legislative body in a particular dependency or territory under its laws.

Nor would there be any restriction on British citizens resident in the United Kingdom from standing
for election as Member of Parliament for any Crown Dependency or Overseas Territory. It is up to
the electors who they vote for, and if they choose to vote for someone from outside their area as
their MP, that is entirely a matter for them.

The larger Overseas Territories, such as Bermuda and Gibraltar, have political parties, while the
smaller ones, tend to have independents elected to their legislatures, as has traditionally been the
case with the Crown Dependencies. It is, therefore, quite possible that a large proportion of them
could return independent MPs, although this is still an unknown factor.

Of those territories with political parties, it is not yet known whether they would contest elections
independently or form electoral pacts with the main British parties. When Gibraltar was combined
with the South West England electoral region in elections to the European Parliament, candidates
from the Liberal Party were included on the Liberal Democrats party list.

The entitlement to vote in elections for a Member of Parliament for a Crown Dependency or
Overseas Territory will be the same as those applying in the United Kingdom, irrespective of what
qualifications may be required for electors in a particular dependency or territory under its laws, be
these restricted to those with British citizenship or extended to foreign nationals.

For example, despite not being eligible to vote in elections for the Gibraltar Parliament, qualifying
Commonwealth citizens resident there were eligible to vote in elections to the European Parliament.
This was a result of it being combined with the South West England electoral region, as they were
in the United Kingdom, also voting in the 2016 referendum on EU membership.

Similarly, French citizens resident in all overseas regions and collectivities have the right to vote in
same national elections and referendums as those in metropolitan France. In addition, since 2010,
Dutch citizens resident in the Caribbean Netherlands have had the same right to vote in national
elections and referendums as those in the European Netherlands.

The rules for the conduct of elections to elect MPs for a Crown Dependency or Overseas
Territory will be laid down by statutory instrument, on a similar basis as those for elections held in
the UK. Returning officers will be similarly be appointed in liaison with the dependencies or
territories, but conducts of the elections will be ultimately the responsibility of the UK.

The salary and allowances payable to a Member of Parliament for a Crown Dependency or
Overseas Territory will be determined, to be on a similar basis as those payable to MPs representing
constituencies in the United Kingdom, taking into account the increased travel and accommodation
expenses which may be incurred on account for some because of the greater distance involved.

This is a recognition that the MPs representing these dependencies and territories are to be directly
elected representatives of their electors. They are not to be indirectly elected delegates of their
legislatures or governments. In this respect, they will be no different from their counterparts
representing constituencies in the UK, despite remaining separate jurisdictions from it.

Were a member of a legislature or government of a dependency or territory to be elected as its MP,
this would be a separate democratic mandate. A precedent for this was set by Sir Gerald Strickland,
Leader of the Opposition in Malta who also served as Conservative MP for Lancaster between 1924
and 1928, during which time he was elected Prime Minister of Malta in 1927.

The parliamentary representation of these dependencies and territories would not affect the position
of their government representatives, as the Overseas Territories of other countries have both. For
example, the Faroe Islands and Greenland, as parts of the Kingdom of Denmark, both have
representative offices in Copenhagen in addition to each having two members of the Folketing.

Conversely, while Gibraltar was represented in the European Parliament by the six MEPs for South
West England between 2004 and 2020, it did not establish a separate government office in Brussels
to liaise directly with the European Commission until 2014. This was headed by Sir Graham
Watson, the former Liberal Democrat MEP, after he lost his seat in elections held that year.

On account of the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories not being currently represented
in the House of Commons, it is necessary to make transitional arrangements to hold by-elections in
the constituencies created under the Act, and that it comes into force in the shortest time possible
following the holding of the last general election.

After the dissolution of that Parliament and the holding of the next general election, eligible voters
in the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories will take part in that and all future elections on
the same day as those in the United Kingdom, with their Members of Parliament serving for the
same term of office as their counterparts representing other constituencies.

While it is for the UK national Parliament to decide on the electoral system for these constituencies,
due to their unique nature, their MPs could be elected using the Alternative Vote (AV) under which
candidates are ranked in order of preference to ensure they have at least 50 per cent of the vote.

In fact, the practice of voting for more than one candidate will be familiar to many voters in the
Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, who are already used to voting for multiple
candidates when electing members for ‘at large’ or ‘island-wide’ constituencies.

Another important issue mentioned previously has been membership of the House of Lords. This is
not part of this Bill, but while the upper house remains constituted in its present form as a
nominated body, there should be some appointments of members who are either from the Overseas
Territories and Crown Dependencies or have strong connections to them.

We also believe that while there are already a large number of Privy Councillors, the same should
criteria should apply in their regard. At present, the Privy Council does have decision-making
powers for the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, both legal and political, and the lack
of representation is another imbalance which needs to be rectified. Again, this is not part of this Bill.

There is also the issue of referendums. The Overseas Territories of other countries, particularly the
French take part in their national referendums. In the UK EU referendum of June 2016, only
Gibraltar was able to participate. The other Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies were not
included even though they were all affected by the decision on EU membership.

There was a petition brought before the Privy Council by citizens of the Isle of Man, Jersey and
Guernsey to have the Crown Dependencies included but this was turned down by the government
of the day. It is to be hoped that if and when there is another UK national referendum, that
Parliament will act to ensure the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies are included.

Over recent years there has been an increase in devolution, with the establishment of the Scottish
Parliament and Welsh Assembly, in addition to the Northern Ireland Assembly. There has also been
devolution of powers to major cities in England such as London and Manchester, but increase in
devolved powers has not affected the number of constituency MPs these cities have.

In the same sense it is only fair for the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, who have
their own forms of devolved government, to have constituency MPs. The UK national Parliament
has a number of responsibilities for the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies.

These include the very important issue of ‘good governance’. It is the ‘good governance’
responsibility of the UK national Parliament to enable the Overseas Territories and Crown
Dependencies to have constituency MPs, the same as for all areas in the ‘British family’.

It has been a major oversight by the UK national Parliament to not bring about this right to
representation much earlier, but it should not be held back any longer. It is no more an obligation
for the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to ask for such representation, than it is for
areas such as Penzance, the Isle of Wight, Anglesey, Western Isles, Bangor or indeed London.

UK parliamentary representation is a right brought about by Parliament and historically that right
and franchise has always been extended by the UK Parliament.

In conclusion, we believe that the proposals to elect nine constituency MPs are fair, reasonable and balanced. The proposed constituencies include all land masses, even those with few or no people, which is no different from some large sparsely populated constituencies in the UK. As matters
develop in future, the Boundary Commissions will have to regularly review constituency sizes.

Further points can be addressed to:
Anthony Webber
[email protected]
+44 7824 444604
Ken Westmoreland
[email protected]
+44 20 7043 1576

END

The Governor’s Office, from Christine Rowlands, said, “The proposal, however, is emphatically not one the UK Government wishes to take forward and neither has the Cayman Islands Government indicated amy desire for it.

“It raises significant practical challenges.

“It is, therefore, very unlikely to proceed further or be debated in Parliament.”