Attorney General’s Chambers update re-Michael Misick

Issued on behalf of the Attorney General’s Chambers, Turks and Caicos Islands.

Update in relation to the extradition of former Premier Michael Misick –Issued Wed, 9 Jan 2013.

“Michael Misick is the subject of an extradition request made lawfully and properly, in accordance with the relevant Treaty in place between the UK and Brazil, as extended to the Turks and Caicos Islands.

“As such, he is currently being held in accordance with the terms of this Treaty, under a provisional warrant of arrest.

“The Treaty requires that the full request with supporting documentation to be submitted formally within 60 days (following his arrest on 7 Dec 2012). It is intended that this request be submitted in Jan 2013.

“Following this Mr Misick will have the opportunity to consider whether he wishes to contest his extradition.

“If he does not contest the extradition, and there are no other outstanding issues, Then everything possible will be done by Turks and Caicos authorities, in collaboration with his legal advisors and the Brazilian authorities, to ensure his speedy return to face questions in relation to alleged crimes during his term in office and to face trial in accordance with our laws.

“We have received assurances that during his time in custody Mr Misick will receive consular assistance from the British Consulate General in Rio de Janeiro, who will work to ensure that Mr Misick receives the same level of treatment as other British prisoners in Brazil, and is treated in accordance with international minimum standards. The consular staff in Rio will provide the same level of consular assistance offered to all British Citizens in Brazil.”

Michael Misick is sought in relation to the criminal investigation arising from the Sir Robin Auld Commission of Inquiry 2008-09 Report, which stated: “1. There is a high probability of systemic corruption in government and the legislature and among public officers in the Turks & Caicos Islands in recent years. It appears, in the main, to have consisted of bribery by overseas developers and other investors of Ministers and/or public officers, so as to secure Crown Land on favourable terms, coupled with government approval for its commercial development. Breach and/or by abuse of the Government’s Belongers’ Empowerment and Crown Land Policies appear to be frequent mechanisms of, and aids to, such transactions.”